Jaipur: A single bench of Rajasthan High Court on Saturday directed the police not to take coercive action against the dairy officials in the FIR registered against them at Chaksu police station in a case related to the detection of unsafe milk from a collection centre at Kothun. The court has asked the state government to submit its reply by December 20.
A single bench of Justice Ashutosh Kumar gave this order while hearing a petition of Jaipur Zila Dugdh Utpadak Sahkari Sangh limited, managing director of Sangh Chand Mal Verma and chairman Omprakash Poonia.During the hearing, additional advocate general Ghanshyam Singh Rathore, on behalf of the state government, sought time to submit his reply. On this, the court gave relief to the petitioners and postponed the hearing till December 20. tnn
We also published the following articles recently
A single bench of Justice Ashutosh Kumar gave this order while hearing a petition of Jaipur Zila Dugdh Utpadak Sahkari Sangh limited, managing director of Sangh Chand Mal Verma and chairman Omprakash Poonia.During the hearing, additional advocate general Ghanshyam Singh Rathore, on behalf of the state government, sought time to submit his reply. On this, the court gave relief to the petitioners and postponed the hearing till December 20. tnn
We also published the following articles recently
Pakistan’s highest court hears petition on forceful deportation of Afghans born in the country
Human rights activists are seeking to halt the forceful deportation of Afghans in Pakistan. The deportations are part of a nationwide crackdown by the government targeting Afghans without proper documentation. Pakistan claims the campaign does not specifically target Afghans, though they make up the majority of foreigners in the country. Since the crackdown began in October, hundreds of thousands of Afghans have been deported or have voluntarily returned home. Human rights activists and UN officials have denounced Pakistan’s policy and called for its reconsideration.
Human rights activists are seeking to halt the forceful deportation of Afghans in Pakistan. The deportations are part of a nationwide crackdown by the government targeting Afghans without proper documentation. Pakistan claims the campaign does not specifically target Afghans, though they make up the majority of foreigners in the country. Since the crackdown began in October, hundreds of thousands of Afghans have been deported or have voluntarily returned home. Human rights activists and UN officials have denounced Pakistan’s policy and called for its reconsideration.
Reply in 4 weeks: High court notice to Bihar government on quota hike PIL
The Patna High Court has directed the Bihar government to respond to a PIL challenging the constitutional validity of the increased reservation for SC, ST, and backward-class applicants in state government jobs and educational institutions. The PIL questions the quota hike on the grounds of violating the SC’s ruling and terms the Bihar Reservation Amendment Bill arbitrary. The changes in reservation were based on the state government’s caste survey, which the PIL alleges increased the proportion of certain castes in Bihar’s population to accommodate a higher quota.
The Patna High Court has directed the Bihar government to respond to a PIL challenging the constitutional validity of the increased reservation for SC, ST, and backward-class applicants in state government jobs and educational institutions. The PIL questions the quota hike on the grounds of violating the SC’s ruling and terms the Bihar Reservation Amendment Bill arbitrary. The changes in reservation were based on the state government’s caste survey, which the PIL alleges increased the proportion of certain castes in Bihar’s population to accommodate a higher quota.
Gyanvapi case: Court to hear plea against Akhilesh Yadav, Asaduddin Owaisi’s remarks on Dec 7
Varanasi court fixes December 7 for next hearing in case related to petition seeking FIR against Akhilesh Yadav and Asaduddin Owaisi for alleged remarks on purported shivling found in Gyanvapi mosque complex. Lawyers abstained from judicial work, deferring the hearing listed for Saturday. Petition filed by Harishankar Pandey in May 2022 demanding case under Section-156(3) of CrPC against Akhilesh Yadav, Asaduddin Owaisi, and Anjuman Intejamia Masajid. ACJM-V court declared the petition maintainable in November 2022 but rejected it in February. Pandey filed revision petition transferred to the court of additional district judge.
Varanasi court fixes December 7 for next hearing in case related to petition seeking FIR against Akhilesh Yadav and Asaduddin Owaisi for alleged remarks on purported shivling found in Gyanvapi mosque complex. Lawyers abstained from judicial work, deferring the hearing listed for Saturday. Petition filed by Harishankar Pandey in May 2022 demanding case under Section-156(3) of CrPC against Akhilesh Yadav, Asaduddin Owaisi, and Anjuman Intejamia Masajid. ACJM-V court declared the petition maintainable in November 2022 but rejected it in February. Pandey filed revision petition transferred to the court of additional district judge.
